A) Presumption B) Burden of proof C) Presumption D) Burden of Evidenced. None of the above
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Sur-rebuttal Evidence C) Conclusive Evidence D) Secondary Evidence E) Rebuttal Evidence
A) I will object because the testimony is hearsay B) I will object because the testimony is based on opinion only C) I will object because the testimony is irrelevant D) I will object because the testimony is hearsay E) I will not object because the testimony allowed by law
A) judicial admission B) judicial confession C) extra-judicial confession D) judicial admission E) admission
A) they are extra judicial confession B) they are judicial confession C) they are extra judicial confession D) they are judicial admission E) they are extrajudicial admission
A) declaration against interest B) dying declaration C) res gestae D) common reputation E) res gestae
A) direct evidence B) corroborative evidence C) positive evidence D) cumulative evidence E) corroborative evidence
A) extra-judicial confession B) judicial admission C) judicial confession D) extra-judicial admission E) judicial confession
A) Relationship of Maria and Peter as mother and legitimate son, respectively. B) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively C) Relationship of Peter and Juan as son and father, respectively. D) Relationship of Maria and Juan as live in partners E) Relationship of Peter and Juanas legitimates on and father, respectively
A) The prosecution has the duty to prove because the accused is not interested in the criminal case B) The accused has the onus probandi because he is the one charged C) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case D) The accused has the duty to prove because he will be put to jail if he cannot prove his innocence E) The prosecution has the on us proband because it is the party filing the case
A) Onus Probandi B) Presumption Juris et de Jure C) Presumption Juris Tantum D) Burden of Proof E) Presumption Juris et de Jure
A) it is not admissible under the res ipsa loquitor rule B) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule C) It is not admissible under the ante litem motam rule D) It is not admissible under the inter aliosactanocerenondebet rule E) It is not admissible under the res gestae rule
A) When he is a Questioned document examiner B) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. C) When it is handwriting of one whom he has sufficient familiarity. D) when he has to testify only as to mental and emotional state of the one who authored the writing. E) When he is criminology graduate
A) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature. B) The doctor can testify because the case is not criminal in nature. C) the doctor can not testify because it is hearsay. D) the doctor can not testify because the communication is privileged E) the doctor can testify because the case is not civil in nature.
A) Misleading question B) Leading question C) Answer D) Maliciousquestion E) Leading question
A) Substantial evidence B) None of the above C) Preponderanceofevidence D) Preponderanceofevidence E) All of the above
A) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun B) Whether or not Zanjoe is positive for nitrates or nitrites C) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one firing the gun D) Whether or not Zanjoe is questioning the results of the paraffin test E) Whether or not Zanjoe is the one committing the crime
A) Direct Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Documentary Evidence D) Object Evidence E) Substantial Evidence
A) It was A who survived B) It was A who died first C) It was A who survived D) It was B who died last E) It was B who survived
A) X died after W B) X died a head of W C) W died ahead of X D) Both died at the same time E) X died a head of W
A) Conclusive Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Circumstantial Evidence D) Prima facie Evidence E) Prima facie Evidence
A) unacceptable B) incompetent C) voidable D) incompetent E) irrelevant
A) The defense will conduct the cross-examination B) The defense will conduct the direct examination C) The prosecution will conduct the direct examination D) The prosecution will conduct re-direct examination E) The defense will conduct the direct examination
A) documentary evidence B) object evidence C) testimonial evidence D) oral evidence E) documentary evidence
A) I will object on the ground of lawyer client privileged communication B) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence C) I will object on the ground of irrelevancy of evidence D) will object on the ground of incompetency of evidence E) I will not object because it was true that Mang Tomas had beard the conversation
A) .The priest cannot be compelled to testify because of priest-penitent privileged communication B) The testimony of the priest is admissible because it is a declaration against interest C) The priest can testify as the situation falls under the rule on res gestae D) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule E) The priest cannot testify without violating the hearsay evidence rule
A) Direct Evidence B) Direct Evidence C) Circumstantial Evidence D) Corroborative Evidence E) Negative Evidence
A) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas violates the lawyer-client privileged communication rule. B) Yes, because Mang Tomas he did not intentionally spy on his boss lawyer Enrique Iglesias C) No, because the testimony of Mang Tomas is pure hearsay D) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation E) Yes, because he has personal knowledge since, he was present at the time Atty. Iglesias and Floyd Pacquaio had conversation
A) Express Admission B) Testimonial Evidence C) Implied Admission D) Secondary Evidence E) Express Admission
A) res inter alios acta nocere non debet rule B) marital privilege communication rule C) marital privilege communication rule D) hearsay evidence rule E) marital privilege disqualification rule
A) Direct examination B) Direct examination C) Cross-examination D) Formal Investigationd. Re-cross examination
A) Material Evidence B) Rebuttal Evidence C) Relevant Evidence D) Material Evidence E) Direct Evidence
A) he declarant survives B) he declarant survives C) The declaration was made under consciousness of an impending death D) The declaration relates to facts which the victim is competent to testify E) The declaration refers to the cause and surrounding circumstances of the declarant's death
A) it is a dying declaration B) It is hearsay C) it is a dying declaration D) it is circumstantial evidence E) It is corroborative evidence
A) Estoppel in pais B) Estoppel by deed C) Estoppel by lashes D) None of the above E) Estoppel in pais
A) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case B) testimony of a victim's cousin who was a drug addict C) testimony of a 5-year-old girl who was raped D) testimony of a deaf-mute in the oral defamation case E) testimony of a blind man in the murder incident involving use of firearm
A) Competent Evidence B) Object evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Prima Facie Evidence E) Competent Evidence
A) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule B) No, she cannot refuse because the subpoena is issued by the Court C) Yes, she can refuse not to testify because of privilege communication D) No, she cannot refuse to testify because it is not covered by marital disqualification rule E) Yes, she can refuse to testify under the parental privilege rule
A) documents B) written agreements C) objects D) testimonial E) written agreements
A) Rebuttal Evidence B) Cumulative Evidence C) Testimonial Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Positive Evidence
A) Civil actions for damages B) Substantive rights of parties C) Administrative penalties D) Ethical conduct of lawyers E) Manner of enforcing criminal law
A) Avoid police investigations B) Punish the accused immediately C) Prolong the trial process D) Secure the conviction of the guilty while ensuring the innocent are not punished E) Protect only the victim
A) Decision of the judge B) Filing of a complaint or information C) Arrest of the accused D) Trial commencement E) Issuance of a subpoena
A) The prosecutor B) The judge C) The offended party or any peace officer D) The defense lawyer E) The accused
A) The police investigator B) The complainant C) The accused D) The judge E) The prosecutor
A) The amount of damages claimed B) The nationality of the accused C) The place of arrest D) The penalty prescribed by law for the offense E) The type of evidence presented
A) At all stages of the criminal process B) After conviction C) Only during arraignment D) Only during trial E) Only when he requests for it
A) In open court B) During preliminary investigation C) In the police station D) Only in the prosecutor’s office E) In private
A) Forbidden in criminal law B) Decided by the police C) A negotiation between judge and witness D) A negotiation between prosecutor and accused for a lesser offense E) The same as arraignment
A) Issue a warrant B) Dismiss the case C) Immediately convict him D) Conduct a searching inquiry E) Refer to mediation
A) The complainant B) The judge C) The prosecutor D) The police chief E) The mayor
A) Punishment B) Civil indemnity C) Confession D) Guarantee for appearance in court E) Fine
A) The court must dispose of the case without unreasonable delay B) The prosecution must drop weak cases C) No postponement is allowed D) The accused cannot delay trial E) Trial must be finished in one day
A) The accused appeals his case B) There are two informations filed C) The prosecution presents two witnesses D) The court changes the charge E) The accused is tried twice for the same offense
A) The sentence to be imposed B) The sufficiency of evidence to file information C) The civil damages D) The jurisdiction of the court E) The guilt of the accused
A) The judge B) The defense C) The accused D) The prosecutor E) The complainant’s lawyer
A) Clear and convincing evidence B) Probable cause C) Substantial evidence D) Proof beyond reasonable doubt E) Preponderance of evidence
A) Issuance of warrant of arrest B) Execution of judgment C) Conviction D) Appeal E) Filing of complaint
A) Only hearsay is excluded B) All evidence is admissible C) Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible D) Confessions can be forced E) Character evidence is always allowed
A) Based on the witness’s own knowledge B) From an expert opinion C) Based on what another person told the witness D) Derived from physical evidence E) Always admissible
A) The court has no jurisdiction over the person of the accused B) The officer who filed the information had no authority to do so C) The information does not conform substantially to the prescribed form D) The facts charged do not constitute an offense E) The accused was previously convicted of another offense
A) Immediately impose sentence B) Dismiss the case C) Ask the accused to withdraw the plea D) Require the prosecution to prove the guilt and degree of culpability E) Refer the case to the Supreme Court
A) Produce documents or objects for inspection B) Remain in detention C) Execute a written testimony D) Pay a fine to the court E) Appear in court and testify
A) Secondary evidence may always be admitted B) Copies are sufficient proof of authenticity C) The court decides which evidence is best D) Testimonies are better than written evidence E) Only the original of a document is admissible to prove its contents
A) Beyond reasonable doubt B) By probable cause C) By credible testimony D) By clear and convincing evidence E) By a preponderance of evidence
A) Expert opinion submitted to the court B) Objects used in the commission of the crime C) Written statements or documents D) Audio recordings E) Testimony given by witnesses under oath
A) The right against self-incrimination and to counsel B) The right to bail C) The right to be free from double jeopardy D) The right to speedy disposition of cases E) The right to appeal
A) Double jeopardy B) Improper venue C) Rebuttal testimony D) Demurrer to evidence E) Lack of probable cause
A) The body of the victim only B) The penalty imposed by law C) The facts proving that a crime has been committed D) The confession of the suspect E) The person of the accused
A) Avoid written evidence B) Speed up trial by replacing direct testimonies with affidavits C) Simplify cross-examination D) Remove the need for witnesses E) Allow secret testimonies
A) The decision can still be appealed B) The case is reopened automatically C) The case is transferred to another court D) The decision is void E) The judgment can no longer be modified or appealed
A) Motion of the complainant B) Order of the prosecutor C) Finding of probable cause by the judge D) Filing of the affidavit E) Request of the police officer
A) Evidence obtained from a lawful arrest B) Evidence submitted by the defense C) Evidence based on the testimony of a witness D) Evidence derived from an illegal search or seizure E) Evidence approved by the court
A) Bail is not allowed before filing of a complaint B) Bail automatically extinguishes the criminal case C) Bail is a security for the release of an accused D) Bail is a matter of right after conviction by the RTC E) Bail may be posted only by the police
A) Being arrested by two police units B) Being convicted twice of different offenses C) Being tried in two different courts D) Being tried twice for the same offense E) Being acquitted and later convicted
A) Election-related crimes B) All criminal cases C) Crimes committed by public officials in relation to their office D) Administrative cases of government employees E) Civil cases involving government officials
A) Drug-related cases B) Estafa cases C) Trespassing cases D) Traffic violations E) Libel cases
A) Dismiss the case B) Suspend the prosecutor C) Issue a warrant of arrest D) Proceed with trial E) Appoint a public attorney
A) Questioning by the prosecution of its own witness B) Questioning by the judge C) Cross-examination of witnesses D) Leading questions by any party E) Questioning by the defense
A) Allowed during direct examination B) Used only by expert witnesses C) Required in re-direct examination D) Prohibited during all examinations E) Allowed during cross-examination
A) Introduce exhibits B) Test the truthfulness and credibility of the witness C) Summarize all testimonies D) Present new evidence E) Support the testimony of one’s own witness
A) Competent Evidence B) Circumstantial Evidence C) Direct Evidence D) Circumstantial Evidence E) Expert Evidence
A) testimonial knowledge rule B) secondary evidence rule C) secondary evidence rule D) documentary evidence rule E) parol evidence rule
A) testimonial knowledge rule B) res inter alios acta rule C) res gestae rule D) res inter alios acta rule E) dying declaration
A) Testimony of Maria that she was a mistress of Juan B) Testimony of Maria that she is the mother of Peter and Juan is the father C) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father D) Birth Certificate of Peter where the entry of Father's Name is marked "unknown" E) Baptismal certificate of Peter where the name of Juan appear sin the entry of father
A) relevant evidence B) material evidence C) corroborative evidence D) material evidence E) substantial evidence
A) Burden of proof B) Presumption C) Burden of Evidence D) Presumption E) Conclusive presumption
A) it is extrajudicial confession B) it is considered part of the res gestae C) it is considered a dying declaration L D) it is a declaration against interest E) .it is considered a dying declaration c. it is extrajudicial confession b. it is considered part of the res gestae
A) demonstrative evidence B) demonstrative evidence C) corroborative evidence D) real evidence E) cumulative evidence
A) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites B) It proves the guilt of the person found positive of nitrates or nitrates C) It proves the firing of the gun by the person found positive of nitrates or nitrites D) It proves the presence or absence of nitrates or nitrites E) It proves the conduct of the paraffin test only
A) leading B) stupid C) leading D) hearsay E) misleading
A) Burden of evidence B) Burden of evidence C) presumption D) None of the above E) Burden of proof
A) B and A must have argument and has grudges B) B's wound must be fatal C) B'sdeath is indispensable D) The declaration must be written E) B'sdeath is indispensable
A) None of the above B) Burden of evidence C) Burden of proof D) Burden of proof E) Presumptions
A) The Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure B) The Rules of Summary Procedure C) The Rule of Court Testimony D) The Oral Testimonies of Witness' Rule E) The Rules of Summary Procedure
A) it is part of the res gestae and therefore admissible in court B) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court C) it is an admission and therefore admissible in court D) it is a confession and therefore admissible in court E) it is a dying declaration and therefore admissible in court
A) Expert Evidence B) Conclusive Evidence C) Conclusive Evidence D) Real Evidence E) SecondaryEvidence
A) Secondary evidence B) Conclusive evidence C) Primary evidence D) Best evidence E) Conclusive evidence
A) excluded by law B) excluded by law C) Admissible D) Corroborative E) best evidence
A) Positive Evidence B) Testimonial Evidence C) Rebuttal Evidence D) Rebuttal Evidence E) Cumulative Evidence |